सीजेआई चंद्रचूड़ ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट परिसर में आयुष समग्र कल्याण केंद्र का उद्घाटन किया
CJI Inaugurates AYUSH Holistic Wellness Centre at SC Premises
National subsidized community kitchens: SC declines to pass directions
Calcutta HC Grants Bail to TV Journalist Arrested in Sandeshkhali by WB Police
Vedanta's bid to resume Tuticorin smelter faces scrutiny from court
Bombay HC Quashes Look-Out Circulars Against Actor Rhea Chakraborty, Brother Showik, and Father
Journalist Files Petition in P&H HC Demanding FIR Against Haryana Police for Tear Gas Shell Incident During Farmers' Protest Coverage
Delhi HC Asserts Doctrine of Absolute Privilege: Bars Claims Against Judges, Counsel, Witnesses, or Parties in Judicial Proceedings
Manipur HC Amends 2023 Order, Alters Direction on Meiteis' ST Inclusion
Allahabad HC Deems Non-Appearance of Advocates in Listed Cases as Professional Misconduct and Bench Hunting
Consumer Commission Orders Air India to Compensate Senior Citizens Rs 50,000 for Broken Seats on Transatlantic Flight

Consumer Commission Orders Air India to Compensate Senior Citizens Rs 50,000 for Broken Seats on Transatlantic Flight

The Chandigarh District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission issued a recent verdict instructing Air India to provide Rs 50,000 in compensation to two elderly passengers. This directive stems from the inconvenience caused to them during a flight from New York to Delhi, attributable to broken seats.

President Pawanjit Singh and member Suresh Kumar Sardana, comprising the panel, observed that the evidence presented substantiated the claim of faulty seats. These defects led to physical discomfort for the complainants, causing them mental distress and harassment.

The directive was issued following a consumer complaint lodged by two senior citizens, Rajesh Chopra and Gamini Chopra, under Section 34 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 against M/s Air India Ltd.

According to the complaint, the couple purchased air tickets from New York to New Delhi, paying a total of Rs 8,24,964 to Air India. Given that Rajesh Chopra is a brain stroke patient and handicapped and had traveled to America for physiotherapy sessions, the couple opted for business class tickets with the expectation of a comfortable journey. However, they claimed that they were compelled to occupy broken seats during the 14-hour flight, having to rely on stools placed in front for support, which caused significant discomfort.

Furthermore, the complainants were unable to recline their seats into a lie-flat position for the overnight journey, exacerbating swelling and pain in Rajesh Chopra's feet. Alongside the complaint, annexed photos depicted the deficiencies in the flight seats.

Upon reaching out to Air India via email regarding the issue, the complainants received a response acknowledging the inconvenience caused but yielding no resolution. Subsequently, when a legal notice was issued to the company, Air India responded by suggesting that the complainants should have been more vigilant in selecting seats suitable for a 14-hour journey.

The Commission focused its attention on determining whether Air India was at fault in delivering its service and whether the complainants were eligible for the relief they sought. It was observed that the documented evidence clearly indicated that the seats assigned to the complainants were defective, failing to slide or adjust properly. Consequently, the Commission concluded that, given the complainants' admitted experience of physical discomfort and mental distress due to the faulty seats during the lengthy air journey, Air India was obligated to compensate them for its deficient service.

In line with its findings, the Commission partially upheld the complaint and granted Rs 50,000 in compensation to the couple. Additionally, it ordered Air India to cover Rs 10,000 in litigation costs.

Case Title: Rajesh Chopra and Another v. M/s Air India




Share this News

Website designed, developed and maintained by webexy