In India, the concept of settlement in criminal cases is a sensitive issue. Unlike civil disputes where parties can freely settle their differences through agreements, criminal law deals with offences against the State. Therefore, not every criminal case can be compromised. However, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) provides a mechanism under 359 of the Bhartiay Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (Section 320 CRPC) for the compounding of certain offences. Further, in some situations, the High Court may quash criminal proceedings under Section 528 of the BNSS (Section 482 CrPC) if the parties have settled their disputes.

Compoundable vs. Non-Compoundable Offences

• Compoundable offences: These are relatively less serious crimes such as defamation, criminal trespass, simple hurt, adultery, or insult. In such cases, the complainant and accused can lawfully enter into a settlement agreement, which the court may record and accept.
• Non-compoundable offences: These include serious crimes such as murder, rape, dacoity, or corruption. The law does not permit compromise in such cases, as they impact society at large. At best, parties can approach the High Court for quashing proceedings if the matter is personal in nature (e.g., matrimonial disputes, financial transactions).

Elements of a Criminal Settlement Agreement

When the offence is compoundable or when parties seek quashing, a settlement agreement may include:

1. Details of the case – FIR number, date, police station, and sections involved.
2. Parties to the dispute – Names, addresses, and their roles (complainant/accused).
3. Background – A brief reference to the incident and subsequent registration of the criminal case.
4. Terms of settlement – Withdrawal of allegations, assurance of no future claims, financial settlement if any, and mutual consent to close the case.
5. Voluntary nature – Both parties must declare that the compromise is free from coercion, pressure, or undue influence.
6. Future conduct – Undertaking by the accused not to repeat the alleged conduct.
7. Binding effect – Agreement that the settlement is final and binding.

Sample Clause (Illustrative)

"The complainant agrees to withdraw all allegations made in FIR No. ___ dated ___ registered under Sections ___ IPC at Police Station ___. The accused expresses regret for the incident and undertakes not to repeat such conduct in the future. Both parties agree that this compromise is full and final and request the Hon’ble Court to record the settlement and quash/compound the proceedings."

Legal Effects of Settlement in Criminal Cases

The effect of a settlement agreement in criminal cases depends on whether the offence is compoundable or non-compoundable under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). Since criminal law is primarily concerned with offences against society, settlements between private parties do not automatically terminate proceedings. The ultimate decision rests with the court.

1. In Compoundable Offences (Section 359 BNSS)(Section 320 CrPC)

• Direct Effect: The settlement itself has legal force. Once parties enter into a compromise and file it before the Magistrate, the court may allow compounding of the offence.
• Result: The case is treated as withdrawn, and the accused is acquitted.
• Example: If a complainant in a defamation case files a compromise petition with the accused, the Magistrate can record the settlement and formally close the case.

Effect: The settlement ends the criminal proceedings immediately, with the court’s approval.

2. In Non-Compoundable Offences

Here, settlement agreements do not have direct legal effect, because the law does not permit compromise of serious crimes. However, parties can use the settlement as a basis for relief.

(a) Before the High Court under Section 528 BNSS (482 CrPC)

• Parties may approach the High Court with a joint petition annexing the settlement deed.
• The High Court, exercising its inherent powers, can quash proceedings if it finds that:
• The dispute is personal in nature (e.g., matrimonial disputes, financial transactions, family disputes).
• Continuation of trial would serve no fruitful purpose.
• Settlement would promote peace and harmony between the parties.
• However, the High Court cannot quash proceedings in heinous and serious offences affecting society at large (e.g., murder, rape, corruption, terrorism).

Effect: The settlement deed becomes a supporting document, and the High Court’s order of quashing is what legally terminates the case.

(b) During Trial in Serious Offences

Even if parties submit a settlement, the trial court cannot discharge or acquit the accused in non-compoundable offences merely on that basis. However, such settlement may influence:

• Bail decisions (court may be lenient in granting bail).
• Sentencing stage (court may impose a lighter sentence if victim and accused have reconciled).

Effect: The settlement does not end the case, but it persuasively impacts judicial discretion.

3. Judicial Precedents

The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of settlements in criminal cases through landmark judgments:

• Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303
  The Court held that even in non-compoundable offences, the High Court has inherent power to quash proceedings if the dispute is essentially private and does not impact public interest.
• Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466
  The Court laid down guiding principles:
• Quashing can be allowed where the offence is private in nature, such as matrimonial disputes or commercial transactions.
• Serious offences like murder, rape, dacoity, or corruption cannot be quashed merely on compromise.
• State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan (2019) 5 SCC 688
  The Court reiterated that while quashing is permissible for private disputes, offences involving moral turpitude, economic offences, and crimes against society cannot be settled privately.

4. Practical Legal Effects

• Binding Nature: A settlement becomes legally effective only when the court records and accepts it.
• Closure of Case: In compoundable offences, it directly ends the prosecution; in non-compoundable offences, it serves as a basis for quashing.
• No Future Claims: Once recorded, neither party can reopen the same criminal dispute.
• Public Interest Check: Courts always ensure that settlement does not defeat the larger interest of justice or harm public order.

Conclusion

A settlement agreement in criminal cases is not like a civil contract; it is subject to legal restrictions and judicial scrutiny. Parties must ensure that the offence is either compoundable under Section 320 CrPC or falls under the category of disputes where the High Court can quash proceedings under Section 482 CrPC. A properly drafted settlement agreement can save time, reduce litigation, and restore peace between the parties, but it must always be presented before the court for approval.

Share this News