New Delhi, June 4, 2025
The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday made a strong observation during a hearing on a plea filed by two journalists from Madhya Pradesh who alleged they were physically assaulted by police officers over their reporting on the illegal sand mining (“sand mafia”) in the state.
While expressing concern over the alleged incident, the bench comprising Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Sandeep Mehta stated,
“It is very easy to make allegations behind someone’s back. Natural justice requires the accused to be given an opportunity to be heard.”
The Court directed that the Superintendent of Police (SP) concerned must be made a party to the proceedings to allow a fair and transparent inquiry into the incident.
Background of the Case
The petition was filed by two journalists who claimed they were illegally detained, physically assaulted, and their equipment seized by officers of the Madhya Pradesh Police after they reported on alleged collusion between local officials and illegal sand miners.
The incident reportedly took place in the Chhatarpur district, and the matter has since drawn attention from various press associations and civil rights groups.
While not dismissing the gravity of the claims, the Court highlighted the importance of procedural fairness and insisted on hearing both sides.
The Court observed:
“Before passing any adverse orders, we need to hear from those who are being accused.”
The bench issued notice to the State of Madhya Pradesh and asked the SP to file a response to the allegations within two weeks. The next hearing is expected to see arguments from both parties.
Implications
The case raises crucial questions about:
• Protection of journalists
• Abuse of police powers
• Freedom of the press
• Judicial oversight in matters of alleged state overreach
Media rights groups have welcomed the Supreme Court’s balanced approach, ensuring that both truth and accountability are served through due process.