Army Flags Security Concerns Over Assam Border Hospital, Top Court Seeks Resolution

Army Flags Security Concerns Over Assam Border Hospital, Top Court Seeks Resolution

The Supreme Court is hearing a dispute over a proposed multi-speciality hospital near Jorhat in Assam after the Army opposed its construction.

The Army flagged security concerns, noting that the hospital overlooks a military camp near the sensitive Indo-Bangladesh border and could facilitate drone movement or the use of long-range sniper rifles.

The Army, which earlier objected to the no-objection certificate issued by the Jorhat Development Authority to the private company, has now said that if the hospital is allowed to come up, it must have a concrete boundary wall over 15 feet high with proper separators, and no window of the multi-storeyed building should face the Army camp.

A Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma, after hearing the Army officials and the Centre, said the court needs to find a balance between public health concerns and national security.

The court asked the Additional Solicitor General and senior advocate Siddharth Dave, who appeared for the private company Dr. N Sahewalla and Company Pvt Ltd, to work out a solution within two weeks.

This came after the Army said it is not outrightly opposed to the hospital, as it could help even Army personnel in emergencies, but stressed that certain safety measures must be put in place.

Banerjee submitted that the hospital must have boundary walls higher than 15 feet with proper separators, and that none of its windows—especially the glass ones the hospital wants—should face the Army camp. After recording these submissions, including those made by an Army colonel, the bench said both sides should work out a solution, stressing that public health and national security are equally important.

"We have requested ASG Vikramjeet Banerjee and senior advocate Siddharth Dave to sit together along with Col. Saurabh to explore ways and means for ensuring the nation's security without overlooking the other important consideration of public health. We expect the parties to place before us the minutes of the meeting leading to positive amicable resolutions of the issues," the top court said in its January 8 order.

The court added that if the hospital project faces extra financial burden due to additional security measures, the Centre may step in to help.

During the hearing, senior advocate Siddharth Dave said the company had bought 8 bighas and 17 lechas of land in Jorhat town, within the Jorhat Municipal Board limits. He said the company applied for a no-objection certificate (NOC), which the development authority granted on March 4, 2022, but later cancelled following the Army’s objections.

Dave argued that authorities were objecting only to the hospital project, even though several other structures, including a marketplace, exist near the Army camp. “No one else was asked to build a 15-foot wall with separators. The area already has many buildings and is crowded,” he said, while showing photographs to the court.

After examining the records, the bench said it must balance the rights and interests of all parties involved.

Dave also referred to the Ministry of Defence guidelines issued on May 18, 2011, which required an NOC from the station commander for any construction within 100 metres of a defence installation, or within 500 metres for buildings taller than four storeys, due to security concerns. He added that the government later revised these rules on October 21, 2016, reducing the restricted distance to 10 metres from the outer boundary of a defence installation.

"I am constructing the hospital which is at least 70 metres away from the Army camp and, therefore, under the existing circular dated October 21, 2016, there was no necessity for the company to obtain any NOC from the Army authorities," he submitted, adding that suspending the construction of the hospital would deprive the public of that area from the facilities of a super-specialty hospital.

Banerjee contested these claims, saying that not just the hospital building but even its boundary wall stands within 10 metres of the defence installation. He argued that the company was therefore required to obtain an NOC from the Army and added that the authorities have relied on the 2011 notification.

On August 4, 2022, the Gauhati High Court allowed the company’s plea and held that under the October 21, 2016 notification, no NOC from the Army is needed for construction carried out beyond 10 metres from the outer wall of a defence establishment.

After directing verification of the relevant facts, the High Court asked the Jorhat Development Authority to issue a fresh order on the building permission granted to the company.

Challenging this decision, the Centre and the Army have now approached the Supreme Court.

Share this News

Website designed, developed and maintained by webexy