Parliament on Wednesday passed a bill to amend the law related to the protection and rights of transgender persons, with the Rajya Sabha approving it after it had already been cleared by the Lok Sabha.

The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026 was passed in the Upper House by a voice vote, even as several Opposition members demanded that it be sent to a select committee for further discussion.

The bill seeks to make changes to the existing 2019 law. One of the key provisions is to give a clearer definition of “transgender” and exclude different sexual orientations and self-perceived identities from its scope. It also introduces graded punishment depending on the severity of offences against transgender persons.

Replying to the debate, Social Justice and Empowerment Minister Virendra Kumar said the aim of the bill is to protect those who face discrimination due to biological reasons. He added that the government remains committed to ensuring legal recognition and protection for transgender persons.

The minister said that the bill is intended to bring transgender persons into the mainstream and ensure they live with dignity. He also highlighted that transgender welfare boards have been set up in more than 30 states.

According to him, the law will help reduce discrimination and provide administrative clarity. He described it as part of the government’s broader goal of inclusive development.

However, several Opposition leaders raised concerns and called for more detailed discussions. Many members, including those from Congress, TMC, DMK, SP and other parties, urged that the bill be sent to a select committee for wider consultation.

AAP MP Swati Maliwal warned that some provisions in the bill are vague and could create fear instead of protection. She said criminalising acts like “alluring someone to present as transgender” could negatively affect families, doctors and support systems.

Other MPs also stressed the need to consult stakeholders, legal experts and members of the transgender community before finalising the law. Some even suggested withdrawing the bill and bringing it back after further review.

Despite these objections, the government rejected the demand for committee review and went ahead with the passage of the bill.