New Delhi | June 19, 2025 

In a significant observation underscoring the growing tension between free expression and public outrage, the Supreme Court of India on Wednesday questioned the rising trend of film bans based on “hurt sentiments.” The remarks came during a hearing on the controversy surrounding actor Kamal Haasan’s upcoming film ‘Thug Life’, which faced threats of a de facto ban in Karnataka.

 

A bench of Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice Manmohan pulled up authorities for failing to protect lawful screenings of a film already cleared by the Censor Board. The Court noted, “There seems to be no end to hurt sentiments in this country. Where are we heading if every opinion invites suppression?”

 

The controversy stems from a comment made by Kamal Haasan during a promotional event for Thug Life in May 2025. Haasan stated that “Kannada was born out of Tamil,” sparking backlash from Kannada linguistic groups. In response, several pro-Kannada outfits demanded an apology and warned theatres against screening the film. Multiple cinema halls reportedly withdrew from releasing Thug Life fearing public unrest.

 

Despite clearance by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), the film’s screening faced informal restrictions. Petitioners approached the Supreme Court, citing a breakdown of law and order and suppression of free speech.

What the Supreme Court Said

 

The Supreme Court made it clear that artistic expression cannot be sacrificed at the altar of fragile sentiments.

 

“Once a film has been cleared by the CBFC, it is legally fit for public screening. You can’t allow fringe groups to dictate what the public can watch,” the Bench said.

 

The Court also expressed concern that law enforcement was not acting decisively against those threatening theatres. It reminded the Karnataka government of its constitutional duty to uphold freedom of expression, even when facing public discontent.

 

The judges warned that encouraging mob pressure or threats under the guise of “public sentiment” creates a dangerous precedent where any artwork could be silenced by loud voices, rather than legal norms.

 

• The Court directed the Karnataka government to ensure full protection to theatres screening Thug Life.

• It condemned the intimidation of filmmakers and theatre owners, asking the state to prosecute those attempting to enforce unofficial bans.

• The Bench also asked the High Court to refrain from issuing directions that may violate the film’s lawful right to screen post-certification.