सीजेआई चंद्रचूड़ ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट परिसर में आयुष समग्र कल्याण केंद्र का उद्घाटन किया
CJI Inaugurates AYUSH Holistic Wellness Centre at SC Premises
National subsidized community kitchens: SC declines to pass directions
Calcutta HC Grants Bail to TV Journalist Arrested in Sandeshkhali by WB Police
Vedanta's bid to resume Tuticorin smelter faces scrutiny from court
Bombay HC Quashes Look-Out Circulars Against Actor Rhea Chakraborty, Brother Showik, and Father
Journalist Files Petition in P&H HC Demanding FIR Against Haryana Police for Tear Gas Shell Incident During Farmers' Protest Coverage
Delhi HC Asserts Doctrine of Absolute Privilege: Bars Claims Against Judges, Counsel, Witnesses, or Parties in Judicial Proceedings
Manipur HC Amends 2023 Order, Alters Direction on Meiteis' ST Inclusion
Allahabad HC Deems Non-Appearance of Advocates in Listed Cases as Professional Misconduct and Bench Hunting
Tejashwi Yadav defamation case quashed: Controversial remarks withdrawn

Tejashwi Yadav defamation case quashed: Controversial remarks withdrawn

The Supreme Court on Tuesday, has quashed the criminal defamation complaint filed against Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav. The decision came after Yadav voluntarily withdrew the remarks that had been deemed defamatory towards the Gujarati community.

A bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan passed the order in response to a plea filed by Tejashwi Yadav himself, requesting the transfer of the defamation trial from Gujarat to a more 'neutral' location. The criminal defamation complaint had been filed in Ahmedabad by Haresh Mehta, the vice president of the All India Anti-Corruption and Crime Preventive Council, alleging that Yadav's comment, suggesting that "only Gujaratis can be cheats," caused both mental and physical harm to the Gujarati community.

The Supreme Court, upon receiving Yadav's plea, stayed the proceedings in November 2023 and issued a notice to the former Bihar Deputy Chief Minister. Subsequently, the Court posed a crucial question to Yadav, inquiring whether he was willing to withdraw the contested remarks. In a pivotal turn of events, Tejashwi Yadav complied, officially withdrawing the statements in question.

"We have quashed the case in view of the petitioner withdrawing his statements on record. Accordingly disposed of," stated the bench, formalizing the resolution of the matter. With the withdrawal of the remarks, the Supreme Court set aside the defamation proceedings against Tejashwi Yadav.

The legal saga began with Haresh Mehta's filing of the defamation complaint, asserting that Tejashwi Yadav's comments had inflicted "mental and physical harm" upon the Gujarati community. Yadav, in response, sought the transfer of the trial location, arguing for a more neutral venue.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal represented Tejashwi Yadav in the Supreme Court, supported by a legal team including Varun Jain, Navin Kumar, Akhilesh Singh, and Radhika Goyal. The apex court's decision, grounded in the withdrawal of the controversial remarks, brings an end to the defamation proceedings and marks a significant legal outcome in this case.

Case: [Tejashwi Prasad Yadav vs Hareshbhai Pranshankar Mehta.

Share this News

Website designed, developed and maintained by webexy